Issues. People. Events.

Waterbury Connecticut's Independent Newspaper
  • Home
  • The Brass Torch
  • Advertising
    • Waterbury Observer Advertising
    • City Guide Advertising
  • About Us
    • Staff and Contributors
    • Mission Statement
    • Pick-Up Locations
  • Columns
    • Observations by John Murray
    • Wandering Observations by Chelsea Murray
    • Ask Judy
    • In Synk by Jim Szynliewicz
    • Main Street Waterbury by Carl Rosa
    • The Buzz by John Rowland
    • Message in a Bottle by Don Coppock
    • Savvy Senior by Jim Miller
    • Movie Review by Susan and Shelly Frome
  • Best of Waterbury
    • Best of Waterbury - Online Ballot
  • Waterbury History
  • Notable Stories
  • Politics
  • Billy Smolinski
 
 
 
 
Translate

Community Bulletin Board

  • UNICO Scholarship Awards Dinner, May 28
  • Post University partners with Masonicare
  • Crosby H.S. in CT Innovation Exposition
  • Award Winning Musical, Jersey Boys, at Palace
  • CT Law Firm Joins Driver Safety Campaign
  • Farm Viability Grant for Brass City Harvest
  • State Grant to Revitalize Vacant Parcels
  • Gallery Tour at Museum~ April 23
  • Palace Theater Announces May Line-Up
  • Rep. Cuevas appointed to M.O.R.E. Committee
  • Annual Arts Show in Naugatuck
  • Fulton Park Clean-up And Restoration April 21

More Community Listings

User login

  • Create new account
  • Request new password

Smolinski Family Headed Back Into Court Today, Civil Trial Winding Down

Thu, 04/12/2012 - 06:30

Billy Smolinski Jr. vanished eight years ago and his family's relentless search to find answers has led to his mother Janice, middle, being arrested, and his mother and sister being sued.

                                                  Story By John Murray

   The Smolinski family is headed to New Haven Superior Court today in what may be the final chapter in a bizarre civil lawsuit filed against them by a named suspect in their son's disappearance. Billy Smolinski Jr, vanished from his life on August 24th, 2004, and when local law enforcement were sluggish to respond to pleas for help, Billy's family and friends launched their own search.

   They hung thousands of missing person flyers throughout western Connecticut, but ran into a hornets nest in Woodbridge where the posters were being destroyed, and Billy's former girlfriend, Madeline Gleason, drove a public school bus. Billy and Madeline had ended their year-long relationship 48 hours before he disappeared. The rift in the relationship was simple - Madeline was cheating on Billy,  she was having an affair with Woodbridge politician Chris Sorenson.

Madeline Gleason

   Billy Smolinski Jr. was tangled in an explosive love triangle that cost him his life. The last three phone calls he made on August 24th, 2004 were to Chris Sorenson's house, and Billy had left a threatening message, "watch your back at all times Chris." In the eight years since Billy vanished a multi-jurisdictional investigation involving the Waterbury PD, the FBI, the Connecticut State Police, Seymour PD and Shelton PD, information has been developed that Billy Smolinski was murdered by Madeline Gleason's son, Shaun Karpiuk, and buried in an unknown grave in the lower Naugatuck Valley. One report indicated that Billy was murdered in Madeline Gleason's apartment.

   In the months following Billy's disappearance the Smolinski family discovered it was Madeline Gleason and her friends destroying and vandalizing the missing person flyers. The Smolinskis would staple them onto telephone poles, and within minutes they had been torn down. The Smolinskis would return the following day and replace the flyers, which would then be destroyed. Day after day, week after week, the Smolinskis continued to replace the flyers.

   The escalating confrontation ended when Janice Smolinski was arrested by the Woodbridge Police Department for allegedly hanging a flyer on school property. The complaint was filed by Fran Vrabel, Madeline Gleason's best friend, a fellow school bus driver, and an accomplice in systemically destroying the flyers. In one shocking video captured by the Smolinski family, Vrabel walked up to Janice Smolinski and ripped down a flyer in her face, and threw it at her feet.

   But Woodbridge was home turf for Gleason, Sorenson and Vrabel, and it was a grieving mother searching for her missing son that remains the only arrest in this upside down investigation. When the Waterbury Observer published an in-depth article in March 2006 revealing the love triangle, and exposed an inept investigation by the Waterbury PD, an already bizarre situation took a hard turn into the absurd - Madeline Gleason sued Janice Smolinski, Paula Bell (Billy's sister), and The Waterbury Observer for harassment and invasion of privacy.

   It took five years for the lawsuit to make it to trial, but during two emotionally charged days in early December 2011, the combatants came face to face in New Haven Superior Court. The Observer, thanks to legal motions filled by Atty. Mark Lee, had been removed from the lawsuit.

Atty. Mark Lee and the Smolinski family.

   Atty. Lee is now the lawyer representing Janice Smolinski and Paula Bell. Lee told the Observer that final written arguments were submitted to the judge weeks ago, and now the judge has called all the parties back into court today. Although Lee said he's not sure what to expect, he believes the judge might give an indication of his impending decision.

   Or, he might render his decision today. Gleason, represented by high-powered lawyer John Williams, has asked for $150,000 in damages. Atty Lee has argued that Gleason has no proof of any damages, and not a single bill to back up her claims.

   "I have a pit in my stomach," Janice Smolinski said. "This should not have happened. If the police had listened to our cry for help we wouldn't be in this situation. Billy's disappearance could have been solved quickly, and his murderers brought to justice. Instead, I have been arrested and sued. The way the police responded to a report of a missing adult - our son - has destroyed our lives."

Share this  |  Login or register to post comments |  Tags: Bill Smolinski, Billy Smolinski, Jan Smolinski, John Williams, Madeline Gleason, Mark Lee, Paula Bell, The Waterbury Observer

Money is Not the root of all evil; It's the LOVE of Money

Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 04/13/2012 - 14:16.
How much do school bus drivers make these days, anyway? As I recall, part of the claim here was for lost wages (even though there was NO proof of same)...and didn't Madeleine Gleason-Sodins want $345,000 originally? And then offer to settle for $25,000 in december...and now it's back up again to $150,000?... back in December she said she'd never sought mental health counseling because she couldn't afford it (or something to that effect)...So her job has no health insurance benefits but pays enough to hire high-powered CRIMINAL DEFENSE attorney John Williams ??? Really ??? if in fact she does still work for B and B driving a school bus....I would certainly hope she does not. I say that not because I think she's a murderer, or an accomplice... but anyone who's not totally blind can see she's EXTREMELY CRUEL and narcissistic. And she has a "gang" mentality, bringing her 2 pals along to obsessively destroy Billy's posters...I would not want my children anywhere near a woman who has exhibited the vile behavior she has toward the Smolinski family.Sincerely, Mrs. Tommy R.
  • Login or register to post comments

Missing/Murdered Billy Smolinski

Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 13:02.
The nation is watching and waiting for this Judge to decide the civil trial and in my opinion, Ms. Gleason and her attorney should be fined by the court for bringing a FRIVOLOUS LAWSUIT against a mother who was simply attempting to find her missing son. What do Ms. Gleason, her alleged companion, Mr. Sorenson and others, impeding the investigation, have to hide? The innocent proclaim this loudly and should be able to easily prove it. This instance seems to be the polar opposite, where spite, vindictive behavior and complete lack of human decency have been the norm. Thank you for this forum and for the updates on this "trial". I hope the next trial is one to bring JUSTICE for BILLY SMOLINSKI. Tracy Miller
  • Login or register to post comments

Gleason wins suit!:)

Submitted by kx250wf on Sun, 08/19/2012 - 00:42.
janice was harassing madeline and madeline won!seems the papers and news fail to mention how mr.tough guy beat madeline up!NOW if i went into your house kicked your moms butt,r u telling me u wouldn't do anything about it? AND if these rumors r true that shaun did kill him it was by accident,i was very good friends with shaun and he was a good kid not a cold blooded murderer! it sounds 2 me that mr.tough guy got his ass handed to him and probably woudnt give up and the rest is history. and as for him having his friends involved its B.S shaun wouldn't tell u what girls he was dating let alone if he accidentally killed somebody by accident,and thats only if any of this is true.THE person who called in the tip only wanted the 60,000 in reward money he could care less about mr.tough guy. Also the info he got went though ten people before he heard about it.
  • Login or register to post comments

the "award" won't even cover legal fees

Submitted by Prieta on Fri, 09/14/2012 - 08:42.
Madeleine Gleason won exactly $52,666. I'm pretty sure that barely covers her attorney John Williams' legal fees (if it even covers them). She originally sued for much, much more. There's no evidence Billy beat her up. If it's a he said/she said situation, well, she's someone who has admitted to lying many times to keep an affair with a married man going, so look at the source. Seems like she was playing the role of the damsel in distress for that red-faced, bloaty city councilman she was seeing. From what I've read, one of Gleason's contentions was that the publicity from this case caused her to not get custody of her granddaughter. In my opinion, there is no way she was ever a serious candidate for getting custody of anyone's child.
  • Login or register to post comments

Flyers

Submitted by Anonymous on Thu, 04/12/2012 - 12:49.
The main issue seems to be the missing person flyers Billy Smolinski's family hung. Flyers which did not mention one single word about Madeline Gleason. Yet the flyers "upset" Madeleine Gleason so much that she felt "traumatized" (I am refering to the first 2 days' Civil Trial statements)...and felt the need to confront the Smolinskis with behavior against the family that got more and more aggressive to the point that Madeline's friend Frances Vrabel physically violated Mrs Smolinski's space and ripped a poster out of her hand.... well it seems to me that since the bottom issue was someone not liking the posters, then if the Judge rules against the Smolinskis it would set a really dangerous precedent. I mean, the next family whose loved one goes missing and they hang posters...should they not do it for fear of being arrested? Being sued by a named suspect in the case ?(Me, personally, if my son went missing jail would not mean anything; nothing would until I knew what happened to him). Very scary to consider... since no one knows what the future holds. A. White
  • Login or register to post comments
Connecticut Naugatuck Valley Community College Main Street Waterbury by Carl Rosa Chelsea Murray Journeys Notable Stories Community Bulletin Board Palace Theater Politics Billy Smolinski Neil O'Leary John Murray Observations Waterbury Silas Bronson Library Mike Jarjura Waterbury Mayor Neil O'Leary Waterbury Connecticut In Synk by Jim Szynkiewicz Message in a Bottle by Don Coppock Waterbury Police Department Mattatuck Museum
more tags

Contact Us | Advertise with Us | Meet the Staff | Pick-up Your Copy of the Waterbury Observer
Copyright © 2012  The Waterbury Observer. All Rights Reserved.

--.